The Observing I
The Observing I Podcast
Not Yet: The Philosophy of Ernst Bloch
0:00
-38:31

Not Yet: The Philosophy of Ernst Bloch

Hope isn’t optimism. It’s a philosophical position.

Not yet.

Three syllables. The entire philosophy. The thing a German Marxist mystic spent ninety-two years and three thousand pages saying, in five countries, through two world wars, one forced retirement, and a wall that went up overnight to keep people from leaving a state he had already decided to leave. Not yet. You could tattoo it on your wrist. You could say it to your alarm clock. You could say it to the mirror at forty-three when the life you were supposed to be living still hasn’t shown up and you’re starting to suspect it got the address wrong.

Ernst Bloch was born on July 8, 1885, in Ludwigshafen am Rhein. You don’t know Ludwigshafen. Nobody romanticizes Ludwigshafen. It is a factory town that exists so that better places can have chemicals. His father ran the railway schedules. The family was Jewish, assimilated, respectable, and according to Bloch, deeply, structurally, almost professionally boring. He described his childhood home as musty. Not cruel. Not dramatic. Just musty. The low-grade suffocation of a life arranged around not wanting too much.

So he wanted everything.

He crossed the Rhine to Mannheim as often as he could. He read fairy tales with the intensity other boys brought to fistfights. He decided, early and permanently, that the gap between what is and what should be is not a personal failure. It is a philosophical category. He left for Munich in 1905. He studied philosophy, then music theory, then physics, because a man who studies only one thing has already decided what he’s going to find. Then Berlin, then Georg Simmel’s seminar, then Heidelberg and the circle around Max Weber, and more importantly around György Lukács, with whom he argued constantly and agreed on the thing that mattered most: philosophy is not observation. It is intervention.

In 1918, at thirty-three, he published The Spirit of Utopia. Europe was standing in the wreckage of the First World War looking at its own hands. Into that specific silence Bloch dropped a book that was part political philosophy, part mystical theology, part musical theory, and entirely impossible to categorize. A handful of people read it and felt like they’d been told a secret about themselves they hadn’t known anyone else knew. That handful included Walter Benjamin. It included Theodor Adorno. It included Bertolt Brecht. The men who would spend the next several decades reshaping Western culture were, in 1918, reading Ernst Bloch and underlining things.

He had no university position. He was, in the polite language of academia, a private scholar. In the impolite language of reality, he was broke.

Then 1933. The Nazis arrived and Bloch left, which was the correct order of operations. Switzerland, then Austria, then France, then Czechoslovakia, then a boat to America, arriving in 1938 with his third wife Karola, his manuscripts, and English so limited that the country that had just saved his life was also completely incomprehensible to him. He settled in Cambridge, Massachusetts. He sat in the reading room of Harvard’s Widener Library, which smells like mahogany and old money and the specific confidence of never having had to flee anything, and he wrote. Three volumes. Fourteen hundred pages. The encyclopaedia of human longing. He called it The Principle of Hope and he wrote it in German, in America, for an audience that didn’t exist yet.

Not yet.

The argument at the centre of those fourteen hundred pages is this: hope is not a feeling. Hope is a structure of reality. The universe itself is unfinished. Human beings are the part of the universe that knows it’s unfinished, and that knowledge, that specific uncomfortable luminous knowledge, is not a burden. It is the most accurate thing about us. Bloch called the forward-pulling force of this incompleteness the not-yet. The not-yet-conscious. The not-yet-become. The ontological category of things that are real without yet existing. He called the shimmer that the future casts backward into the present the Vor-Schein. The pre-appearance. The light from a fire that hasn’t been lit yet, somehow already warm.

You’ve felt this. The beginning of something before you know what it’s beginning. A book, a room, a person across a party. The unreasonable certainty that something is about to change. That is not delusion. Bloch says it’s data. The future making itself felt in the only language it has, which is longing.

In 1948, East Germany offered him the chair of philosophy at the University of Leipzig. He was sixty-three and had never held a permanent university position. He went. You want to judge him for this and the honest answer is that the judgment contains its own contradiction, because he was the philosopher of hope and here was an attempt, imperfect and already somewhat alarming, but an attempt at the thing he had spent his life arguing for. He became the official philosopher of the GDR. He won the National Prize in 1955. He had students. He had a journal.

Then the Hungarian uprising of 1956. The Red Army crushed it in November. Bloch watched and revised his view of the regime, which is a very calm way of saying the thing that broke. He started writing about humanistic freedom. The party decided this was a deviation. In 1957 they forced him to retire, suppressed his journal, and condemned his works. The state that hired him to be its philosopher discovered it wanted a mirror, not a thinker. A mirror is cheaper and easier to manage and requires no salary.

In August 1961 the wall went up. Bloch was in West Germany on a visit. He did not go back. He went to Tübingen instead, to an honorary chair with no salary, to a small house and a new city and the same argument he’d been making since 1918.

And then 1968 arrived and brought the students with it.

They were looking for a philosopher who believed the present was not the final word. They found an eighty-two year old man in Tübingen who had been saying exactly that for fifty years and who had been fired, exiled, suppressed, and walled out for saying it, and who had kept saying it anyway. He became their philosophical godfather. The man the Communist Party found too radical for Communism became the spiritual centre of a revolt that capitalism found too radical for capitalism. He didn’t fit anywhere. He fit everywhere that was on fire.

This is the revelation that the episode tries to land without landing too softly: the surplus escapes. Whatever system you build, however tight, however totalizing, however many walls you pour, the utopian surplus in human beings escapes. Because it is not a political position. It is not an ideology. It is structural. The not-yet is not something people decide to believe in. It is something people cannot stop believing in, the way they cannot stop dreaming, the way the body insists on breathing even after the mind has made other plans.

The East German state suppressed Bloch’s books in 1957. By 1968 those books, in West German editions, in photocopied pages passed hand to hand in seminar rooms, were shaping the political imagination of a generation. Suppression is an excellent marketing strategy. The party wanted to silence him. Instead it made him a myth.

Bloch died on August 4, 1977, in Tübingen. He was ninety-two. Nearly blind. He had just finished revising his complete works across seventeen volumes, which is the kind of project you take on when you are constitutionally incapable of stopping. He didn’t believe in endings. He believed in continuations.

Not yet.

Here is what he leaves you. Not hope as a feeling. Not optimism, which is hope with the difficulty edited out. What he leaves is a permission. The philosophical permission to take your longing seriously. To not apologize for the gap between what is and what you feel should be. To treat that gap not as evidence of your naivety but as evidence of your accuracy. The world is not finished. You know this. The fact that you know this, the specific ache of knowing this, is not a malfunction of your psychology.

It is a correct reading of the situation.

You are not a finished thing. That used to feel like a problem.

Maybe it’s a description.

Not yet.

Much love, David x


Episode 143 of The Observing I is available now on Spotify, YouTube, Apple Podcasts. and wherever you listen. Subscribe at theobservingi.com to support the show and receive every episode directly. Ad-free. Always.

Discussion about this episode

User's avatar

Ready for more?